论坛全局菜单下方 - TICKMILL 285X70论坛全局菜单下方 - ThinkMarkets285X70论坛全局菜单下方 - 荔枝返现285X70论坛全局菜单下方 -  icmarkets285X70
查看:674回复:0
小概率事件
注册时间2008-06-12
Weak-Form Efficiency in Currency Markets (zz)
楼主发表于:2008-06-13 00:48只看该作者倒序浏览
1楼 电梯直达
电梯直达
Weak-Form Efficiency in Currency Markets (zz) Weak-Form Efficiency in Currency Markets Financial Analysts Journal Kuntara Pukthuanthong-Le and Lee R. Thomas, III May/June 2008, Vol. 64, No. 3: 31-52 (doi: 10.2469/faj.v64.n3.5) View Table of Contents Abstract Many past studies have found that currencies trend, so technical trading rules produced statistically and economically significant profits. In other words, foreign exchange markets were weak-form inefficient. The study reported here reexamined this phenomenon with use of a new database of currency futures for 1975–2006 that includes old and newly liquid currencies. The findings from the recent data are contradictory. The profitability of trend following eroded for major currencies and their associated cross exchange rates around the mid-1990s. Newly liquid currencies after 2000 do trend, however, just as major currencies did in earlier years. The evidence is consistent with early weak-form inefficiency followed by vanishing trends as traders learn and adapt their strategies. Summary Trend following was a successful strategy for the major currencies and their associated cross exchange rates during the 1970s and 1980s and, for certain currencies, during the 1990s. Since 2000, however, trend following in the major currencies has yielded poor results, and the results are broadly similar for the major currencies’ cross exchange rates. Practically speaking, trend trading appear to have been unprofitable in recent years, which supports the assertion that the major currency markets have become weak-form efficient after many years of inefficiency. We do not know why currencies trended in the first place. One hypothesis is that early markets were inefficient simply because inefficiency is a characteristic of immature markets. But we bring additional evidence to bear on this open question. First, cross exchange rates show the same pattern as dollar exchange rates—profits in the early years followed by an erosion of profits in later years—making it unlikely that the dollar exchange rate results are a consequence of chance or implicit data mining of the 1972–2000 period. And the results also fail to support the hypothesis that trending was largely a result of central bank intervention. Second, we find that although trending in major currencies has vanished, newly liquid exchange rates have been very profitable for trend traders in recent years. This finding suggests that trending is a feature of all newly trading currencies, and based on the experience of the major currencies, we would expect these profits to vanish in time. Supplemental Material Weak-Form Efficiency in Currency Markets (Supplemental Material) Topical Index Keywords [ 本帖最后由 管理员No.1 于 2008-6-13 10:46 编辑 ]
TK29帖子1楼右侧xm竖版广告90-240
个性签名

韬客社区www.talkfx.co

广告
TK30+TK31帖子一樓廣告
TK30+TK31帖子一樓廣告

本站免责声明:

1、本站所有广告及宣传信息均与韬客无关,如需投资请依法自行决定是否投资、斟酌资金安全及交易亏损风险;

2、韬客是独立的、仅为投资者提供交流的平台,网友发布信息不代表韬客的观点与意思表示,所有因网友发布的信息而造成的任何法律后果、风险与责任,均与韬客无关;

3、金融交易存在极高法律风险,未必适合所有投资者,请不要轻信任何高额投资收益的诱导而贸然投资;投资保证金交易导致的损失可能超过您投入的资金和预期。请您考虑自身的投资经验及风险承担能力,进行合法、理性投资;

4、所有投资者的交易帐户应仅限本人使用,不应交由第三方操作,对于任何接受第三方喊单、操盘、理财等操作的投资和交易,由此导致的任何风险、亏损及责任由投资者个人自行承担;

5、韬客不隶属于任何券商平台,亦不受任何第三方控制,韬客不邀约客户投资任何保证金交易,不接触亦不涉及投资者的任何资金及账户信息,不代理任何交易操盘行为,不向客户推荐任何券商平台,亦不存在其他任何推荐行为。投资者应自行选择券商平台,券商平台的任何行为均与韬客无关。投资者注册及使用韬客即表示其接受和认可上述声明,并自行承担法律风险。

版权所有:韬客外汇论坛 www.talkfx.com 联络我们:[email protected]